Quick Summary Camera Selection Guide:

Update: 6/26/2014

All the camera in the world can be summed up in these 3 criterias:

Light gathering ability: Larger the sensor and lower the lens f number, the more light camera gathers. Therefore, this guide is broken down into sensor size. In general, the larger the sensor, the more expensive the camera. Except for M4/3 size cameras. They cost more for the sensor size you get. Their entire claim to fame is small camera size. You decide whether is worth it. Of course, lower the f number, the more expensive and larger the lens. Typically better quality as well. f2.8 and below are typically professional quality lens.

Auto Focus capability: Nothing beats DSLR for focus tracking. Mirrorless like Samsung NX1 is coming close, but still can't track an object too well especially in low light. Many videos out in youtube shows focus tracking, but watch out, they use small aperture in bright light. Means large depth of field, so everything are in focus anyway. Try it with a fast lens in low light. Forget about it.

Size: Typically, mirrorless camera body itself will be about 1.5"-2" thinner and lower than equivalent DSLR. Width is about the same. Lens size and weight will be almost the same in many cases. Be aware that mirrorless manufacture has been pushing very hard on their products to the point of cheating in their specs to claim their small size. Olympus for example faked their ISO numbers with introduction of their M4/3 line so you think picture quality is same as an APSC camera. That was until DxOMark blew their cover. In retaliation, you will read many posts claiming DxOMark is fake, false etc. These are shills for the manufacture. Beware. Sony made their zoom lens for the full frame mirrorless smaller than other manufacutures to claim small size. What you loose is you end up getting dark corners in the picture, but the camera brightens it for you automatically, so many people don't know about the trick unless you are very knowlegeable about cameras. Just beware, you are not getting something for nothing. Remember, weight is about the same about a remote car key to a small apple difference. (There is quite a few charts on that elsewhere on this site.) Size, 1.5"-2" thinner and lower. You decide whether that is worth it. All else are hype.

 

 

1" Sensor Interchangeable Lens Mirrorless Cameras 

Smallest size sensor photographer can use on an outing and still keep a straight face. Acceptable in daylight, but no good indoor or low light.

Crop factor = 2.7

Nikon 1 S1, Nikon 1 J1, Nikon 1 V1: (Obsolete) Came out in 2011 Why does it exist: Nikon wants to enter the interchangable lens mirrorless market, but don't want to cannibalize it's DSLR camera sales, so they gave it a small 1" sensor. 1" sensor that does not do so well in low light. Only slow lens are avilable also does not help. V1 never sold too well.

Nikon 1 S2 $446 w/11-27.5mm f3.5-5.6 14.2MP ,
Nikon 1 J4 $596 w/10-30mm f3.5-5.6 18MP
Introduced 2014 Why does it exist: Micro size interchangeable lens camera. Quality build. Almost as nice as Apple products. Can somewhat track an object due to focus point on sensor, but only in bright light. Why not: Slow lens and small sensor means daytime use only. Has silent electronic shutter mode with 1/60 sec scan rate. This relatively fast scan rate means less image distortion if object is moving.

Nikon 1 S2 is entry level, J4 adds touch screen, magnesium and aluminum housing instead of plastic.
Both has unique availability of high speed video: 768x288 @ 400fps, and smallish 415x144 @ blazing high speed of 1200fps. Only other cameras with high speed video are Casio EX-100, Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1, Sony RX10IV and RX100II.

 

Nikon 1 V3 Introduced 2014 $1,196 w/ kit lens. Why does it exist: Bird watchers loves this small camera with available ultra zoom. Top of line Nikon 1. Blazing fast autofocus. Why not: Slow lens and small sensor means daytime use only. In addition to J4, this has two control dials instead of one, detachable viewfinder, tiltable screen, faster 1/250 flash sync., optional external flash (S2 and J4 cannot attach external flash), higher quality magnesium housing.
Note, this camera cannot use Nikon's DSLR flashes. So no remote or multiple flashes. Build in flash. No weather seals.

Nikon 1 AW1: $746 w/ kit lens. Introduced in 2013. 14.2MP Why does it exist: World's first and only waterproof interchangeable lens camera. Why not: Features are more like the older S2 camera. Mainly for daytime use only. Depth to 49.2' of water. Shock resistant to 6.6' drop. Two available waterproof lens: 10mm f2.8 and 11-27.5mm f3.5-5.6.

Samsung NX Mini: $400 w/9-27mm f3.5-5.6 lens. Introduced in 2015. 20.5MP Why: Competition to Nikon 1. Better sensor with back side illumination. Why not: Slow lens just like Nikon. Thinner than Nikon at 22.5mm thin vs 29mm for J4 and S2. No focus points on sensor like Nikon, so poor focus speed. Has tilting LCD.

 

 

Micro 4/3 Sensor Mirrorless Cameras

Smallest size sensor pro-photagraphers will use for a paid shoot. Acceptable image quality, but poor in low light. Photographer will say this is "good enough" for certain gigs, especially for web pages. Note: Olympus and Panasonic M4/3 lens are interchangeable. By now, there is a huge selection of lens.

Crop factor: 2

Olympus OM-D E-M5 (Obsolete): 16MP $999 Introduced 2012 Why does it exist: First mirrorless camera to have fast focus. Why not: Cannot track focus: source . First generation view finder is slow and color is off.

History: Until 2010, Olympus had 4/3 sensor DSLR camera. These lens are called 4/3 lens. (Not micro 4/3, so don't get confused.) However, their 4/3 camera could not compete with Nikon and Canon, so they switched to mirrorless 4/3 called micro 4/3. Mirrorless to try to emphasize on the smaller size.

Special features: 5 axis stabilization, but there has been complaint of a humming noise at all times from stabilization system. Weather seal and partial magnesium case. Top and the important front are magnesium. Two control dials. Flash sync 1/250 sec. Articulating LCD. No build in flash. Electronic viewfinder is lower resolution 1.44M-dots. First generation viewfinder has very different color balance than LCD. Recent price drop to $599.

Olympus E-PM2 (Obsolete): 16MP $400 Introduced 2012 Why does it exist: Same sensor, processor as E-M5, but in a super compact body. Why not: No viewfinder is why is so small. No build in flash, but has compact external flash. Image stabilization. Fast focus, but like the E-M5, cannot track an object. Very capable camera that can be had for cheap now.

OM-D E-M1: $1,299 16.3MP Introduced in 2013 Why does it exist: Top of the OM-D line. Focus point on sensor and almost waterproof. Why not: Look at GX7 that is just as capable, but maybe less waterproof.
Better auto focus with legacy DSLR 4/3 lens because of focus points on sensor. Pretty well focus tracking most of the time in good lighting. Focus peaking to assist focus with manual lens. High resolution 2.3M-dot electronic viewfinder. No anti alias filter for sharp image. Highly acclaimed 2 position toggle on back of camera to switch functions assigned to dials. Great weather seal and all magnesium construction. One reviewer even did a shower test with the camera and survived. Build in WiFi. This camera comes pretty close to DSLR in auto focus tracking.

Panasonic DMC-GX7: 16MP $697 Introduced in 2013 Why: Compact camera with professional features and controls. GX7 has fast .1 sec. autofocus, but still cannot focus on kids running towards the camera. Original GX1 is and slow. GH3 is suppose to be good for AF tracking, but is still not good for objects moving towards the camera. This one still cannot really focus track. GX7 does have a unique pop-up flash that can be adjusted to bounce off ceiling for softer light. Notable features includes: high resolution 2.3M-dot electronic viewfinder that has accurate color (Unlike OM-D E-M5's viewfinder that has off color), and is .70X equiv. magnification. That is higher than Nikon D7100 DSLR that has .63X, and close to the champion Canon 1D X that has .76x magnification. So you see a large picture in the viewfinder. In body sensor stabilization. 1/320 flash sync that is faster than most cameras including Panasonic's GH4, which has 1/250. Flash can control wireless external flashes. 3 level focus peaking. Magnesium body. Front and rear control dials, 4 physical customizable buttons with 3 different configuration setting modes. This type of control is in the pro-camera category. Good viewfinder, dual dial and 1/320 flash sync makes this a full featured camera that is a notch better than many other cameras. Loved by many M4/3 photographers. Price dropped from $1,097 to $697 makes this a very attractive option.

Olympus OM-D E-M10: $699 16.3MP Introduced in 2014 Why does it exist: Lower grade OM-D camera. Why not: Low resolution viewfinder.
No weather seal. 3 axis stabilization instead of 5. Does have the popular two "2x2" dials with toggle function switch that is very versatile. Focus peaking display for manual lens.

Cost from lowest to highest: E-M10 < E-M5 < E-M1 (hightest grade). They all have 16.4MP sensor resolution, however, performance of sensor for ISO and dynamic range increase as you go up in cost. Therefore, image quality goes up with the other more expensive cameras. Same lower resolution 1.44M-dot viewfinder as E-M5 instead of high resolution 2.3M-dot of E-M1.


Olympus PEN E-P5: Introduced in 2013 $999 16.3MP Why: Competition to GX7 above. Basically a E-M5 without the SLR look and viewfinder. Why not: Not that competitive with GX7 IMHO. No build in view finder. Same sensor as OM-D E-M5, but with weaker anti-aliasing filter for sharper image. Has 5 axis stabilization, but not as effective as 5-axis on E-M5. Note that this E-P5 is different than E-PL5. The E-PL5 belongs in the PL (PEN Lite) line that is consumer oriented with less controls. This P5 has front and back dials like pro-oriented cameras. Lightning fast autofocus.
Optional excellent 2.3M-dot $279 VF-4 view finder. Viewfinder is 1.48X magnification. That is equivalent to .74X on full frame. Only Canon 1DX is larger at .76X! Can also use slightly lower cost $249 VF-2 with .72X equiv. magnification. VF-2 has lower 1.44M-dot resolution viewfinder that is equivalent to E-M5 view finder. New focus peaking, but there is a refresh delay on that feature that is bothersome. Build-in WiFi and "2x2" two dials with toggle to change dial function like the pro Olympus cameras. Tiltable LCD screen. Camera has a pop up flash. Note: Optional flash use same slot as optional viewfinder. Put one or the other on, but not both. Lacks weather seal of E-M5.
Bottom line: $999+$279 for VF-4 viewfinder = $1,278. E-M5 is $999. You get better viewfinder than E-M5, but here you cannot use external flash at the same time, and no weather seal. Not as effective 5-axis stabilization. Compare with E-M10 at $699, the E-M10 is cheaper, but with 3 instead of 5 axis stabilization, and lesser viewfinder. Tough choice.


Olympus PEN E-PL7: Introduced in 2014 $699 16MP Why: Economic camera. Not prosumer like E-P5 that has dual dials, but better than consumer E-PL6 with no control dial. 3 axis stabilization, tilt LCD screen with 180deg tilt. Single control dial. WiFi. This has the picture quality of the OM-D SLR camera, but in a more consumer oriented point and shoot type body. Lightning fast autofocus.

Panasonic GH4 Introduced in 2014 $1,697 Why does it exist: One of few cameras with cinema quality 4k movie and very fast autofocus. Why not: Sensor too small for low light scene, so cannot be for all around serious movies. Designed specifically for movies with camera on the side. Unlike the GX7 that is made for picture, and has video on the side. Fast focus mirrorless M4/3 camera. Have new DFD, Depth from Defocus to predict where to focus for super incredibly fast focus. Can be as fast as Sony A6000. Single point focus is faster than most DSLR. Focus tracking is still a question. 2.36M-pix viewfinder .67X equivalent magnification. That is even more magnification than Canon 7D that has .66X equiv. magnification. Canon 7D is considered industry leading in magnification for this range of camera. This viewfinder is suppose to have very minimal lag, and 10,000:1 contrast ratio.
Reason this is potentially better for movies than DSLR like Canon 70D and 5D for several reasons: Can use viewfinder in movie mode. Way better focus performance in video mode than DSLR. Has focus peaking for manual focus, and zebra for exposure. Canon only has that in the Cinema line that is >$5k-$25k. However, not a low light performer because of the small M4/3 sensor. Better than Blackmagic movie cameras. Can use optional (very expensive) $2,000 DMW-YAGH module that expands connection to XLR mic and 4 SDI output. If you are a pro, and got to have it, it will make this into a pro cinema camera more or less.

Panasonic DMC-GM5 Introduced in 2014 16MP Why: Aim to be smallest size interchangable lens camera. Why not: Sacrafice on: no tilt LCD, no internal flash, no image stabilization. Comes with thin 12-32mm f3.5-5.6 lens. But does have a small .59X electronic view finder. Has same sensor as GX7. Has hotshoe for external flash. Has improved autofocus compared with older version GM1.
Panasonic DMC-GX8: 20MP $XXX Why: Highest MP yet for a M4/3 camera. Rangefinder style body.

 

 

APS-C Sized Sensor Mirrorless Cameras

Smaller APS-C sized sensor for those who don't want to pay the price for full frame sensor. Mirrorless for thinner camera, but about the same weight really.

Sony NEX 7 (Obsolete) Came out in 2011 Why doe it exist: It does not exist anymore, is obsolete now. This is a prosumer level APS-C mirrorless camera for Sony. Is the first serious departure from the translucent mirror that Sony previously used on A77 above. Is a first indication that mirrorless will trumpt translucent mirror. Obsolete most likely because it has slow focus. source

Sony NEX 6 (Mostly obsolete - Get a6000) Came out in 2012 $449 - Sony is not involved with Micro 4/3 sensor mirrorless camera, but they are into APS-C sized mirrorless camera. NEX 6 is a mid range camera. The main difference between NEX6 and the lower NEX models is this one has an electronic viewfinder. This is the baselevel for a serious prosumer camera. Have phase detect sensors that is suppose to make focus as fast as DSLR, but the camera is still not as fast. NEX camera can only use Sony NEX lens, and not Sony Alpha lens. NEX camera can also use Zeiss Touit series of prime lens. Touit lens are made for both Sony and Fujifilm with different mounts. Large .73X equiv. magnification viewfinder.

Fujifilm X-Pro1 (Superceeded by X-E2) Came out in 2012 $899 16.3MP Why does it exist: Range finder camera. Claim to fame is hybrid optical viewfinder with electronic viewfinder overlay. Why not: Slow autofocus. Viewfinder is fixed for a equivalent 18mm lens. If you attach a longer zoom lens on the camera, a smaller box in the viewfinder indicate where the framing of the picture is. Somewhat ad hoc. Advantage of optics viewfinder with added information from electronic overlay. Aluminum construction, no X-trans sensor. This camera has been overcome by technology. When it came out, electronic viewfinders had lots of lag, and poor quality. Most of those issues are fixed. But this still have the quality construction of older camera.
Canon EOS M2 Came out in 2013 $799 drop to $400 18MP Why: Canon join mirrorless bandwagon. Why not: Painfully slow and unreliable autofocus. Did not sell at all. APS-C sensor. Started in 2012 with EOS M. Year latter came out with M2. Still slow focus. Great picture and sharp lens, but painfully slow autofocus that is not reliable all the time. Use EF-S line of lens, optional adaptor to use all the other Canon EF lens. Currently is discontinued.
Fujifilm X-A1,Fujifilm X-M1,Fujifilm X-E2 16.3MP Came out in 2013 $499,$599,$1,199 respectively w/ 16-50mm f3.5-5.6 kit lens. Why does it exist: Compact range finder style mirrorless camera with electronic viewfinder. Why not: Slightly slow autofocus. These are all lower grades than the top of the line Fuji X-T1. X-T1 is shaped like a legacy SLR film camera to show that is in a different class.
X-A1 has very low resolution .92M-dot viewfinder, no X-Trans sensor. Slow 1/180 flash sync. Pop-up flash. Still relatively low resolution1.04M-dot viewfinder.
X-M1 has in addition to X-A1: X-Trans sensor that does not require Anti-Ailias filter by randomizing color sensors. Lack of filter results in sharper image. Focus peaking for manual lens.
X-E2 has in addition to X-M1: On chip auto focus detector, Build in WiFi. High resolution 2.36M-dot viewfinder .64X equivalent magnification. (Magnification on the low side) Top and front plates are magnesium, rest are plastic. No weatherseal.
Beware when comparing image on dpreview or other sites that Fuji state their ISO higher than actual. Their high ISO noise is no better than the competition. Same thing that Olympus does. I see not significant advantage to Fujifilm camera relative to other players.

Sony a6000 $798 Introduced in 2014 Why does it exist: This along with Panasonic GH4 both release in 2014 are suppose to be a game changer for mirrorless. Suppose to match DSLR in auto focus ability. 24.3MP Contrast and phase detect. Should have excellent focus speed. Why not: Autofocus still cannot track, and user report issues with focus hunting. Priced between NEX5 and NEX6. Currently is the fastest autofocus mirrorless camera. Makes NEX6 somewhat obsolete. NEX5 at this point has too slow autofocus. Still cannot completely do focus tracking like DSLR can. a6000 use Sony NEX or Zeiss Touit mirrorless lens. Sony native NEX lens in general do not have very good review unlike the Sony Alpha lens for its translucent camera like the A77ii. Get Zeiss Touit prime lens for good quality. You are still left without a good zoom lens for this camera. 344g weight.

Fuji X-T1: $1,300 Introduced in 2014 Why does it exist: Looks like a traditional Fujifilm SLR camera. This is currently the highest level APS-C mirrorless camera for Fuji. Came out in 2014. Why not: Fuji-autofocus speed can be an issue. Firmware upgrade should help, but still cannot focus track. Fuji XT1 with 35mm F1.4 is very slow. On the positive side, Fujifilm is going to release a very wide 16-50mm f2.8 zoom lens. Canon and Nikon do not have fast zoom lens that goes down to 16mm. 17mm on a Canon and Nikon is just not wide enough. 50-140mm f2.8 is also coming to add to their line up for a capable system. This will be a small and thin APS-C mirrorless camera with some capable lens. Only auto focus is the question. X-T1 is very similar in performance to X-E2. They use the same sensor. Fuji cameras in general does not have very fast autofocus.
Beware when comparing image on dpreview or other sites that Fuji state their ISO higher than actual. Their high ISO noise is no better than the competition. Same thing that Olympus does.
X-T1 is similar to X-E2 with addition of: Magnesimu case weather sealed. 8FPS instead of 7FPS speed. Larger .77X instead of .64X viewfinder of the X-E2. Articulating LCD. 440g instead of 350g. No pop-up flash on X-T1, but include EF-X8 external flash. X-E2 has one.

Sony SLT-A77: (Obsolete, replaced by A77 II) $1,098 Came out in 2011 Why does it exist: Sony tries to compete with Nikon and Canon, but does it without a mirror. Before mirrorless focus technology was in place, Sony tried to use a translucent mirror instead of a hard mirror for their DSLR. The translucent mirror blocked about half a stop of light, or 33% loss, entering the sensor per dpreview. Half a stop, or 33% loss of light sounds like a lot, but consider that the human eye has about 6.5 stops, and with change in the irus, 20 stops, half a stop is not that noticeable. Sony and reviews claims that half a stop of light does not matter, but the system did not catch on. Reality is, you will have to use higher ISO number, and that cause more picture noise. These Alpha camers has to use Sony Alpha lens. Sony therefore carries both Alpha and newer mirrorless NEX lens.

Sony SLT-A77 II: $1,098 Introduced in 2014 Why does it exist: Translucent mirror for very fast autofocus during liveview or movies. Why not: Translucent mirror in the path of light takes away 1/3 to 1/2 EV of light, and some resolution also. Not a huge problem, but there is the principle that you don't put a thick glass in the optical path. It will take away some light and resolution. This camera introduction shows Sony is still serious about its translucent mirror technology, and not abandoning it for mirrorless camera. 24MP. Sony in the past has been accused of abandoning their camera lines and changing to new technologies. Sony wants to be a serious player, so they are sticking to translucent mirror. Note that Nikon that has legacy lens that are compatible going back to the 70's. Canon compatibility goes back to the 80's. Translucent technology is almost obsolete. To make this camera competitive, Sony bundle with 16-50mm f2.8 lens for $1,298. Good price for a lens that goes as wide as 16mm. Sigma and Tamron only goes down to 17mm. That 1mm does make a difference.

Samsung NX3000 Introduced in 2014 $499 w/16-50mm f3.5-5.6 lens. 20MP Why does it exist: Not that interesting of a camera. Mirrorless, thin and light, APS-C, but no viewfinder. Similar to lower end Sony mirrorless NEX-3 and NEX-5. Could be good second camera.
Samsung NX30 $799 20MP Introduced in 2014 Why does it exist: Nothing special here. Samsung before NX1 below has not been very competitive with their camera line. This one has large size for comfort, and light weight for carrying. 375g and very comfortable grip.A light DSLR has a little appeal. Android interface with WiFi, so camera apps are available, and easy connection to phone.This may be the perfect combination for ergonomics. Hybrid AF system. Articulating viewfinder. Very fast autofocus in good to moderate light. Slows down in poor light. Display lag in low light is bothersome. Use Samsung NX lens. The Line of lens is growing. They have an impressive fast 16-50mm f2.0-2.8 lens. f2 is pretty impressive fast, and 16mm is just what is needed for wide angle. Nikon, Canon, Sigma and Tamron only start at 17mm or 18mm, and that is not low enough.

Samsung NX1 $1,499 28.2MP Introduced in 9/2014 Why: Three letters: "BSI". Stole the show at 2014 Photokina. Significant leap in camera technology with BSI, Back Side Illumination sensor. Light sensors are in front, and wires and circuits are behind the light sensor so circuit wires do not block the light. This is suppose to be the one to beat Nikon and Canon and steal the crown from the legacy manufacture. But alas, performance was not as good as expected. DxOMark show some improvement in noise, but significant decrease in dynamic range. It turns out that BSI is greate for cell phone with tiny sensors, but larger sensors have significantly more sensing area aleady, so some blocking by wires is insignificant. However, it does have the highest MP sensor for APS-C cameras. 28MP vs 24MP for its competition. Sensor has extensive auto focus cells for fast focus. Focus is fast, but still cannot track like DSLR. At this point, people wonder if mirrorless will ever be able to focus track an object like DSLR. First camera to use Codec H.265 instead of H.264 for video compression. Much more sophisticated, and compress twice as much video data. 4K video. Fastest .5 millisecond delay for electronic viewfinder. DRIMe V processor is hardwired to process signal directly instead of running thru software codes to do the processing. Should be very fast. The hardwired program can also be changed in the future. Processor so powerful, there is a function to detect 100mph baseball just as it contact the bat to take a shot. More sports program are on the way. Sensor is capable of puting out 240FPS at full 28MP. That is unimaginably fast shotting speed. However, current software limits camera to 15FPS. 1/8000 shutter speed with 1/250 flash sync. Theoretically, this camera should be able to do electronic shutter with 1/250 scan rage. That would eliminate rolling shutter. Full magnesium construction.The specs say there is huge potential in the sensor, but this camera is not currently programmed to take full advantage of the sensor. Samsung is probably saving the rest of the tricks either for a higher end model. Despite the hardware, user comment is that is still not as good as Nikon/Canon for auto focus tracking of moving objects.

Samsung NX500 $799 28.2MP Why: Basically the flagship NX1 in a smaller body. Best compact interchangeable lens camera because this is fast, high quality picture and high resolution along with 4k video. Why not: No viewfinder. Viewfinder would have made this bigger. If all you intend to use is the 16-50mm f3.5-5.6 kit lens, seriously consider the Sony RX100 IV. Smaller sensor, but lower f number. In the end, light gathering ability is the same, but Sony is smaller. Samsung is $699, Sony is $950. As with all mirrorless, can't focus track an object, and focus struggles in low light. BSI sensor with on sensor AF detector along with high power processor helps this camera quickly acquire focus. 1/6,000 shutter with 1/200 sync. 15fps. Tilting LCD. Of course WiFi and Bluetooth. This is better than Sony because this can record raw files for greater processing while Sony has a lossy compressed raw file format, so you loose some data. 287g.
Fuji X-T10: $698 Introduced in 2015 16MP Why: Phase detect focus points on sensor. Flagship X-T1 has always been weak on focus. This fixes that problem. Strip down version of X-T1. Why not: As with all focus points on sensor, they don't do well in low light and as with all mirrorless, don't track an object well. Tilt LCD, 2.36M dot viewfinder .62X (.41X full frame equivalent) magnification, which is pretty low. 8fps, acceptable 1/4000 sec shutter. Build in flash. WiFi 381g.

 

APS-C Sized Sensor DSLR Cameras

Smaller APS-C sized sensor for those who don't want to pay the price for full frame sensor.
Crop factor 1.6 (1.5 for Cannon)

Nikon D300S: (Out of production and obsolete) $1,696 Why does it exist: Profession quality APS-C sensor DSLR. 12.3MP Came out in 2009. Full size sensors are prohibitively expensive back then, so APS-C was an alternative. This is the top of the line APS-C. The "S" version has video capability. Great auto focus tracking, tough and durable magnesium case. Is almost like a APS-C version of the full frame D3 camera. Unfortunately, as full frame sensor came down in price, Nikon never upgraded this camera. Neither did Nikon bring more APS-C lens out. People are forced to use full frame sensor lens that is heavier and larger especially the popular 70-200mm f2.8 that is a giant for full frame camera. Is hard to say how much smaller it would be for APS-C, but smaller would have been nice to have regardless. Bloger Thom Hogan has preached for years why Nikon, Canon should bring out more APS-C lens. Now that the pendulum has swung to smaller is better, Nikon and Canon may finally bring out more APS-C lens because they are smaller eventhough they are interchangeable with full frame cameras. APS-C lens on full frame will have dark area on the side, and newer cameras will just crop them out. Little outdated, but still a viable used camera if you like an older high end camera for half the cost. BTW, at the time of D300, there was also D90, which is the beginner's camera, D700, low cost full frame and D3, professional full frame.

Canon 7D: (Out of production) Why does it exist: This is Canon equivalent to Nikon D300S. 18.8MP Came out in 2009, and never updated. All magnesium construction. Excellent and fast auto focus. Very comfortable to hold, the grip is excellent. This is the highest level APS-C Canon camera in terms of solid construction. Sensor score may be somewhat lower than current generation of Nikon cameras like the D7100, but about just as good as current generation of Canon camera like the 70D. Canon have somewhat lower sensor scores than Nikon. This does not have as many features like on sensor phase detect focus like the Canon 70D, but still pretty good sensor. If you need a durable camera with solid fast focus, this is it. Little outdated, but still a viable used camera if you like an older high end camera for half the cost.

Nikon D7000 (Out of production, and replaced by D7100, but should still consider this): $600-$700 Came out in 2010 Why does it exist: One step down from professional APS-C format D300S. 16.2MP. In reality, the sensor score on D7000 is higher than D300S. D300S is a more rugged professional camera with better auto focus. D7000 already has pretty good autofocus and can track an object pretty well. Camera has partial magnesium housing and somewhat of weather proof seal. Only problem with the magnesium housing is the critical part where the metal lens mounting ring screws onto is plastic. Wish Nikon put magnesium in this critical high stress front lens mount area instead of putting magnesium in the back of the camera. Why?
Compare with the camera that is one step lower, the D5300 does not have magnesium housing or weather seal. Also this has focus motor in body for older lens that D5300 does not. Most importantly, has auto focus micro adjustment that the lower D5300 does not. D7000 has now been replace by D7100.
The reason I bring up the D7000 is because this is a sleeper, and still a camera to consider today. Sensor has a score of 80 compare with 83 for D7100, so sensor is just as competitive as the newer model. D7000 has only 16.4MP compare with 24.3MP for newer D7100. Some people actually sold their D7100 and bought the D7000 again because of lower pixel count that results in better light gathering ability for dark shooting. Nice to have smaller file size of the 16.4MP also. Newer is not always better. Seriously consider this over the newer D7100 since there are some old stock that are at steep discount. High end camera for low cost.

Sigma SD1 : $1,828 15MP Came out in 2012 Why: Foveon X3 sensor. Red, blue and green photocells are stacked on top of each other instead of individually spread over four squares in a Bayer mask pattern. Makes for super sharp picture that even D810 with 36MP cannot quite match. Lines and shapes are crisp and sharp. Why not: Picture quality unacceptable after ISO 800. Range is 100-6400, but at 6400 why bother, can hardly make out the details. For this camera, acceptable autofocus speed, no liveview and no movies. Great magnesium build with weather seals. Very slow 15sec write speed, but has buffer for 7 frames. Main shortcoming is ISO noise, but incredibly great pictures that even Nikon D810 cannot beat.

Canon SL1 (100D): $499 Came out in 2013 Why does it exist: Smallest DSLR camera to compete with mirrorless. Why not: Picture quality is poor, so not recommended. Came out in 2013. At 407g, is also the lightest. This is a partial attempt at going up against the mirrorless camera that are smaller and lighter. It actually weights about the same as a similar mirrorless cameras. Sony a6000 is 344g versus this is 407g. The difference is a car remote and a key. However, Canon for whatever reason put an obsolete sensor in the camera that performs no better at high ISO than a smaller sensor Micro 4/3 cameras. Maybe Canon was afraid if consumer latch onto lighter cameras, they will have to trim weight a cross their entire line-up. So Canon made this an under performing camera. Hope this is not the Kodak syndrome that caused their downfall will film.

Pentax K-3: $1,196 Introduced in 2014 Why does it exist: Pentax camera have excellent build quality that last a long time under tough conditions with weather seals. Why not: Autofocus and tracking for Pentax is typically slower and less reliable than Nikon and Canon. Top of the line Pentax. Interesting use of image stabilization to induce blur. The induced blur is used instead of anti-aliasing filter. Effectively a variable anti-aliasing filter. Pentax does not make a full frame DSLR. (However, they do make a huge 645Z medium format sensor camera with 51MP.) Pentax DSLR to take advantage of it's vast amount of excellent legacy lens. Some say their lens are better at color rendering than Canon and Nikon. Came out in late 2013. Pentax has always been behind Nikon and Canon. However, Pentax offers better construction, more durability and better weather seal than Nikon D7100 and Canon 70D for the same price. This is equal to the Nikon D300S and Canon 7D that was never updated, but this Pentax is up to date and performs well. 24MP. Pentax has a good selection of pancake lens in a good range of focal lengths that can make for a very compact camera. Their fast normal zoom is 16-50mm f2.8. Canon and Nikon fast normal zoom is 17-55mm f2.8. That extra 1mm is very needed. It allows for a true 24mm equivalent wide angle shot. The only downside is Pantex 16-50mm is not as sharp as Canon and Nikon wide open. Something about a 16-50mm f2.8 zoom lens that is hard to make. The Tokina 16-50mm f2.8 for Nikon and Canon is also not very sharp wide open. Is no longer in production either. Pentax is actually a very good deal. People in the know get the Pentax for its durability and quality construction.

Pentax K-5 II, K-50, K-500: Why does it exist: Pentax has better features and sturdier builds than Nikon and Canon at a lower price. Why not: Autofocus and tracking for Pentax is typically slower and less reliable than Nikon and Canon. Pentax has, less lens choice because is less well known. Price: $696, $646, $399 respectively. K-5 II vs K-50: 7fps vs 6fps shooting speed. 14 bit Raw vs 12 bit raw color resolution. Magnesium vs plastic. K-50 still has weather-resistant seal, while the bottom of the line K-500 does not. Pentax also has an older K-30. K-50 is almost identical to K-30, but updated. The K-50 has dual dial 100% view finder. Very good at this price range. Pentax are good value, even the K-500 has a penta prism for the viewfinder instead of pentamirror mirrors like the Nikon D3300 at the same price point.

Pentax K-S1: $646 20MP Why does it exist: Mid level DSLR. Sharp lines on the body, and flashing LED lights on the grip to be unique.

Nikon D3300, D5300, D7100: $596, $746,$1,096 All have 24.2MP Why does it exist: These are the mainstay of Nikon's APS-C DSLR lineup. This is the standard camera that enthusiasts would go for. Why not: If you are not shooting moving object, mirrorless cameras are little smaller and slightly lighter. If you are not shooting low light, consider M4/3 cameras for smaller package at slight reduction in image quality. They have been upgraded over the years. In general, D3300 and D5300 are meant for slow low cost lens. Only D7100 is meant for fast lens with shallow depth of field because only D7100 has focus finetune needed for very shallow depth of field fast lens. D3300 is the entry level department store DSLR camera. D5300 is start of prosumer level DSLR camera. D5300 mainly has more auto focus options, and 39 point auto focus instead of 11. It can use wireless flash if you get the Nikon high end flash that can act as a master. This is where a hobbiest photographer would consider getting as a second camera. D7100 is right in the prosumer market. It has two dials for fast control, and very good auto focus. D7100 also has partial magnesium case, weather proofing seals, focus drive motor for older lens and micro focus adjustment. Focus adjustment is very important for older lens or third party lens. A lot of times a lens always focus too far or too near, and this will solve it instead of going to the repair center that sometimes still does not get it right. D7100 in addition can use its build in flash as the master to control other Nikon slave flash. With the D7100, you don't have to get the expensive flash that can act as the master like with D5300. Note that the sensor rating for all three cameras are about the same. They all have same amount of high ISO noise. Higher cost D7100 has the most dynamic range followed by D5300 then D3300. Lowest cost D3300 has the highest color sensitivity. D3300 is a very competent camera even if it has less features. 1/8000 shutter and 1/250 flash sync for D7100 1/4000 and 1/200 flash sync for D5300 and D3300.

Canon T3i (EOS 600D or X5), T5i (EOS 1200D or X70),70D: $499, $599, $1,099 Why does it exist: These are the mainstay of Canon's APS-C DSLR lineup, the standard that enthusiasts would go for. Why not: Canon typically score slightly lower on image quality than Nikon, but have very good lens selection. These are the Canon equivalent of Nikon's D3300, D5300 and D7100. Even the weight of each corresponding cameras are about the same. In general, T3i and T5i are meant for slow low cost lens. Only 70D is meant for fast lens with shallow depth of field because only D7100 has focus finetune needed for very shallow depth of field fast lens. As with Nikon, the 70D is prosumer, and the only one with focus micro adjustment. Unlike Nikon 70D does not use magnesium whereas Nikon D7100 has partial magnesium. Both have weather proof seals.
In general Nikon sensors are rated somewhat higher than Canon per DxOMark which does extensive measurements.
Note that 70D is the first camera to have phase detect auto focus on the sensor. This gives it excellent auto focus in live view mode where you use the LCD monitor to shoot instead of viewfinder. That means it has excellent focus in movies as well. None of the Nikon DSLR has integrated phase detect focus on the sensor.
T3i is baseline. With Canon, even the baseline model can use its flash to remote control Canon flash. Nikon need to go to the 3rd level with the D7100 to do that. Articulated LCD. 4fps speed, 9 point auto focus. Next level up, T5i adds phase detect on sensor cell. However, review shows it was not very effective. 5fps shooting speed, same 9 point auto focus. Touch scree LCD on T5i. 70D adds: Weather proof seals, but still plastic housing. Auto focus micro adjust. Very effective autofocus detectors on the sensor for movie and liveview. No second card slot like equivalent Nikon D7100. 19 point autofocus. WiFi to talk with iPhone. 7fps speed. 70D is good choice for movies except for the fact there are limited STM lens. STM series of lens have silent autofocus. 70D with STM lens has incredibly fast autofocus even with movies.
In terms of sensor performance, T3i and T5i perform about the same, but 70D has higher score, and better in high ISO as well as dynamic range. Regardless, Nikon series of DSLR, the D3300,D5300 and D7100 all exceed these Canons in sensor ratings. Even the lowest cost Nikon D3300 is better then the highest cost 70D Canon. Comment on the forum is that Nikon has the technology, but they are not good at marketing. On the flip side, there are other comments that Nikon renders all the colors more on the orange side, but Canon is more balanced and artistic.

Canon 7D Mk II : $1,799 2014 Introduction. Why: Only pro quality APS-C camera on the market. Why pro quality: All magnesium construction, 65 point cross type focus, 10 FPS burst mode. Why not: Nikon D7200 is its competition. Better image quality, but not as good build. Focus cells on sensor. With the kit 18-135mm f3.5-5.6 STM lens, autofocus is shockingly fast, reliable and silent. While people lament that Nikon no longer update the D300, Canon brings out the 7D MkII. This is the Canon equivalent of the Nikon D300. The original 7D came out in 2009, about the same time that the Nikon D300 came out, and both were getting long in the tooth. This will compete strongly with Nikon D7100, which has slower frame rate, plastic front side, but potentially better picture quality. As with Canon DSLR, dynamic range is not as good as Nikon.

Nikon D5500: $796 24.2MP Why does it exist: Update to D5300. Major news is the feather weight of 420g with battery. This brings the camera down to mirrorless territory. Why not: Mainly meant for low cost slower lens. More expensive fast lens with good light gathering ability also has shallow depth of field, and require focus adjustment for sharp pictures especially third party lens. This camera does not have focus adjustment, so shallow depth of field may be an issue if you are not lucky enough to get a perfect lens match with the camera. Nikon lens are typically very well match, but third parties like Sigma or Tamron may have to be sent in to match for you. Major issue for fast lens if you are a discriminating photographer. No low pass filter on sensor, and articulating LCD screen. Build in wi-fi. Focus tracking ability of DSLR with light weight of mirrorless makes for a very nice camera.

Nikon D7200: $1,100 24.2MP Why does it exist: Update to D7100. Fixes two major complaints: the shallow buffer of D7100 and fix color banding of Toshiba sensor under certain specific condition but Sony sensor slightly more noise. Buffer can capture 18 raw files instead of 6 raw files. Better autofocus with 51 focus points to compete with Canon 7D Mk II. Build in wi-fi. 675g weight. This is the top of the line crop sensor DSLR Nikon has. Now comes with very high performance autofocus that surpass any mirrorless. User comment is autofocus tracking on D7200 is better than Canon 7D. Larger and slightly heavier than mirrorless, but better autofocus. Large size viewfinder 100% .94X (.63X Full Frame EQ).

 

Canon 750D (T6i) / 760D (T6S): $750 / $849 24.2MP 555g / 565g Why does it exist: Finally a 24MP sensor instead of 18MP. Added Hybrid CMOS AF phase detection on sensor for focus speed during live vew and movies. Articulating LCD. 5 fps. 19 instead of 9 AF points in viewfinder mode. Flash sync 1/200sec. Wi-Fi. Viewfinder 95% coverage at .82X (.51X Full Frame EQ), is somewhat small. Intersting high dynamic range HDR video. Proprietary algorithm that will capture both bright and dark area in the scene.

760D: In addition to 750D: LCD on top plate. Add a rotary ring on the directional selector for scrolling thru menus. Hybrid CMOS AF III instead of AF. Allow for continuous focus tracking while in live view shooting.

Canon 80D
Nikon 7500 - 20MP Similar to autofocus capability as the D500. Same sensor as D500. Has 180k metering sensor.

 

 

Full Frame Sensor - Both DSLR and Mirrorless Cameras

Traditional sized 35mm full frame camera is the gold standard in image quality for both ISO and dynamic range. Shallow depth of field for subject isolation when needed.

Nikon D700 - (Obsolete, no replacement) Came out in 2008. Full frame camera in a professional full magnesium, but compact body that is the same as the D300 APS-C camera. Both the D300 and D700 are greatly loved by fans, but Nikon never updated these two cameras. Theory was that these two cameras were so much like professional cameras like the D3 and latter D4 that it cannibalize sales of their professional line.
Nikon D600 - (Obsolete, replaced by D610) Came out in 2012 $1,600 24.3MP Why does it exist: First affortable full frame sensor camera from Nikon. Canon not to be outdone, announced their 6D weeks latter. This was replaced by the D610 due to oil issues from the shutter assembly getting onto the sensor. It was such an issue that Nikon had to change the camera name when they fixed the issue. D600 owners should get a free shutter assembly replacement especially if you are the original owner.
D610 shown, D600 similar.

Canon EOS 6D Came out in 2012 $1,899 Why does it exist: First affortable full frame sensor DSLR from Canon. Came out in 2012. Pretty light at 770g. Use to be, to get full frame sensor camera, you have to go with the EOS 5D Mark III that cost $3,399. Now full frame camera price has dropped to less than $2,000. The body of this 6D is based on the APS-C sensor 60D. 60D has been upgraded to 70D currently. Because is base on the small sensor 60D, the autofocus points are clustered more towards the center. This is similar to Nikon D600 full frame camera. Magnesium body with plastic top plate to allow the WiFi and GPS to work. Note this camera does not have a build in flash.

Sony SLT-A99: $2,298 Came out in 2012 Why does it exist: Full frame camera from Sony. Full frame version of the Alpha translucent mirror camera. Came out in 2012. High ISO quality is not that good, and image is noisy by today's standard. Most people would get the full frame Alpha 7 mirrorless camera now.

Nikon D800 (Obsolete, replaced by D810) $2,997 Came out in 2012 Why does it exist: 36MP High resolution full frame camera that is affortable.

Canon EOS 1D X $6,799 18.1MP Came out in 2011 Why does it exist: Full frame, Super fast auto focus and build like a tank for professional. 14FPS speed.

Canon EOS-1D C $11,999 18.1 MP Came out in 2012 Why does it exst: Exactly like 1DX, but add 4k video. Use APS-H 1.29 crop factor to record 4k movies. Note: Frame rate is 24P instead of 25P common in Europe. This camera has stiff competiton from Panasonic GH4 M4/3 sensor camera. Panasonic has way better autofocus, features like focus peaking and zebra. This has a much larger full frame sensor for low light performance. No build in flash. Class leading large .76x view finder.

Canon EOS 5D Mark III $3,399 22.3MP Came out in 2012 Why does it exist: True full frame camera that is a notch down from 1D. Popular choice for filmaking with manual focus. Autofocus is too jerky. Slower autofocus than 1D. This is similar to D800 for Nikon, but no build in flash.

Nikon D610: $1,896 Came out in 2013 Why does it exist: Low cost full frame sensor camera. Replace D600 that had oil on sensor issue. Body base on D7000. Auto focus sensor clustered in the center of viewfinder because the AF module came from an APS-C camera, most likely the D5300 to save cost. 850g

Nikon Df: $2.746 Came out in 2013 Why does it exist: 16.2MP on a full frame camera means it can capture light very well. Can almost shoot in the dark with a fast prime lens. Also is a retro camera with multiple dedicated marked knobs on the top for quick adjustment. Unlike the unmarked knobs that other high end camera have where you have to look at a screen to tell what the numbers are at. Down side is this camera still use auto focus from the smaller APS-C sensor D5300 with the result that focus points are clutered in the middle of the viewfinder. Also, there is no video feature on this camera. Some people complain about these two points especially given the cost that is close to D800. Partial magnesium case. Top, back and bottom are magnesium. Ergonomics wise, this is a great handling camera and light for a DSLR at 760g. Controversial camera, but people who use it seems to absolutely love it. Note that although this is a light camera, it has no build in flash, so weight adds up if you have to carry an external flash.

Sony Alpha 7(Obsolete), 7R and 7s: $1,498, $2,298,$2,498 Why does it exist: Mirrorless interchangable lens camera with full frame sensor. Small size of mirrorless with full frame sensor. It is what people has been asking for. However, this is where things get very confusing with naming. This "Alpha" camera is not the SLT-A99 full frame camera that people also call the alpha because SLT-A99 has a greek alpha symbol on the camera. Difference is here the name is spelled out "Alpha" while the SLT-A99 camera has the "SLT" acronym in its name. Alpha 7,7R and 7s are full frame mirrorless camera. The 7 is 24MP, 7R is 36MP and 7s is 12MP. 7 is the middle of the road full frame camera at 24MP. However, 7s only have 12MP because it is for low light. Less MP on the sensor means each pixel is larger, and can gather more light. Better low light performance. 7R with 36MP is to compete with latest Nikon and Canon that have high pixel count for bragging rights. You suffer in low light condition though. Sony has the 3 variation just to cover all bases. Viewfinder magnification is .71X. Autofocus is not this camera's strenght. Is somewhat slow. The 7R shutter is very loud as noted by several users. A7 should not be loud though. Need a $800 XLR-K1M adaptor to record cinema quality 4k movie. A7 focus speed is faster than A7R.
Alpha use NEX lens, but now the NEX lens mount are split into two category APS-C or full frame. If is Sony E, the lens is smaller APS-C. Use that lens on this camera, and only part of the sensor will be used. Use Sony FE lens, and camera will use the entire full frame sensor. Of course, the Sony FE lens are heavier than the Sony E. Note issues with mirrorless lens. See half way down the page. Note that Sony make some of the best sensors out there because they have deep pockets. Other manufactures even Nikon and Canon use Sony sensors for some of their cameras. Do note that Sony RAW file format is compressed, and some picture information is lost. Sony files are not as good as other RAW files.

Nikon D810 $3,296 Introduced in 2014 36MP Why does it exist: Base ISO of 64! No other camera has that low ISO. More expensive to make, but result is less noise and more dynamic range at ISO 64. Many consider this to be the absolute best camera you can buy for image quality short of going to medium format. Price is less than that of professional full frame cameras like D4s. Giving up build qulaity compare to D4s. Expanded ISO range down to ISO 32. Much lower than the typical 100. Great for long exposure shot of waterfall or ocean to get the image of the water to blur, and have the dreamy cloud like look. .7x viewfinder. Also has an option for 12-bit instead of 14-bit color gradiant to reduce RAW file size to 9MB. The full 14bit files is 75MB uncompressed, or 43MB lossless compressed. You can of course choose JPEG for much smaller file size. All magnesium case. Unlike the Canon full frames, or even Nikon's Df and D4s professional full frame models, this has a build in flash. Build in flash may be considered too consumerish for the pro D4s. This has a very quiet shutter sound. Shutter designed for minimal vibration because 36MP is very sensitive sensor. Slight vibration will blur it. Has a 91,000 pixel metering sensor high enough pixel for face recognition. The $4,500 Zeiss Otus 85mm f1.4 and 55mm f1.4 manual focus lens are made specifically for this camera. Super sharp lens to take advantage of the 36MP resolution and 64 ISO. That would be the ultimate combination. 980g

Nikon D4s $6,496 Introduced in 2014 Why does it exist: Full frame. For sports, has the absolutely best auto focus and high frame rate. Also very rugged for professional use. The build makes all other cameras even the D810 full frame seem like amatures. This is truly a professional tool. Is also large and heavy. Also note that this camera does not have a build in flash, so it truly is a professional model that expects you to carry a separate flash. Has new sRAW file format for reduced file size.

Leica M9 $6,895 18MP Why: Leica rangefinders makes great cameras for protraits because of their great lens. The render skin tone very well. Dial for each function laid out in logical manner base on classic Leica design. Dial has un-equal detent spacing, so you know where you are at by feel without looking. Smooth manual focus lever is very fast with practice. Buy Leica for the excellent lens and not the camera. Nothing else can match their lens. Is not the best value for the dollar, but the the experiance is unique. Is like Aston Martin vs Corvette. One has character, the other value for performance.
Good 3D depth "pop" Superceed M8 and M8.2. Finder magnification is .68x versus .72x for film M7 or legendary film M3 at .91x. Shutter button gritty. Use metal instead of the classic cloth mechanical shutter.
Leica M-E $5,450 18MP M9, but strip down. No USB socket and preview lever;
M9-P
$7,995 M9, but upgraded. Added sapphire crystal LCD;
Leica M9 Titan Limited Edition Set
$26,500 M9, but premium edition. Solid titanium construction w/ 35mm f1.4 ASPH lens.
Leica M9 Monochrom $7,950 Why black and white only: Monochrom takes out the bayer color filter array in front of the sensor. Several good results comes out of that. Sensor is not divided into different color cells. No loss of detail when colored light strike the wrong color cell, and camera can't resolve the light's exact position. This is similar to Sigma's Foveon sensors. The details you get is amazing, and is not the same as going to a higher number of pixels. The look is not the same. Monochrom sensor results in very good details. Color filter blocks 2 of the 3 colors and only let in one. A lot of light is being blocked out. Without color filter, sensor gets much more light resulting in excellent high ISO image.
Leica M Type 240 $6,950 24MP Updated model to M9. Use CMOS sensor instead of CCD of M9. Microlense with strong curvature along with short distance between microlens and sensor maximize quantum efficiency at high ray angles. Use 110/90nm CMOS process. This allows the camera to use full range of Leica legacy wide angle lens, and not get blocked light rays at the edge. This is the same issue with all mirrorless. With film, light can come in at any angles, and film will capture it. With digital, light need to be straight on as possible for maximum capture. Wide lens designed for film have light ray coming in from the edge of the lens. Digital sensor cannot capture the light coming in from the side edge of the lens. This sensor tried to use high curvature lens to capture light rays from all angles.
Optional $499 Leica EVF-2 1.4M-dot viewfinder. Is same as the outdated Olympus VF-2 viewfinder. EVF allow use of camera even if manual range finder focus has drifted. EVF is too laggy. Live view with focus peaking. HD video. Smoother shutter and weather sealed. Still not as good as old M3. .68x viewfinder. All European made including sensor.

Nikon D750 $2,299 Introduced in Sep 2014 24MP Why: One level above D610. First for Nikon: tilt screen LCD. Features: In addition to D610, faster, more accurate autofocus with 51 points focus that is same as D810. D610 only has 39 points that is towards the center because the focus sensor likely came from D7100 that has a smaller APS-C sensor. Autofocus is also better than D810 in that is rated to -3EV low light. WiFi, tilting LCD. Carbon fiber reinforce plastic front instead of just plastic. Same magnesium back. 6fps. Buffer improved from 57 image to 87 jpg images. .7x viewfinder. 1/4000 shutter and 1/200 flash sync similar to D610 compare with D810 with 1/8000 shutter with 1/320 flash sync. Shutter is louder than D810. Some complaints about the shutter noise. Considered jack of all trade for full frame DSLR cameras. 750g.

D750 is a great upgrade to D610 because of the improved autofocus that people did not like about D610.

Sony Alpha 7II: $1,498, 24MP. Same as original A7, but with 5-axis sensor image stabiliztion, and has better autofocus. Shutter is loud, but just slightly too loud, and.not obnoxiously loud like on 7R.

Sony Alpha a7R II: $3,200, 42.4MP. Why: Focus points on sensor for faster focus and potential focus tracking. BSI sensor not for light gathering, but for faster readout. 5 axis stabilization. 4k video. Huge .78X electronic viewfinder. Why not: Short battery life. Sony has limited lens line-up. High ISO noise slightly worse than Nikon D810. Although dynamic range is slightly better. Third party lens can have compatibility issues. Not as good focus track as DSLR.
Too many fake users who are marketing shills singing praise for this camera. Here is the low down:
Everyone wants to know autofocus performance. Can it finally equall DSLR:
Autofocus in good light is very fast as is typical for mirrorless of this generation.
In dark environment, have to use a fast lens to get good autofocus. Otherwise, it hunts and is no good.
Is not very good for sports. Multiple players confuse the autofocus.
Can focus a Canon lens as fast as Canon DSLR with Metabones adaptor. HOWEVER, with the adapter, you are closing in on weight of DSLR and size, and not all focus modes works. Adapter is additional $400.
Great for video, because focus in video mode is way better than DSLR and viewfinder is useful for video.78X EVF is very large. Bigger than all DSLR. However, EVF does have washout issues in certain high brightness/darkness environment. Lastly, mirrorless may be small, but lens will be pretty much the same size simply due to optical physics. Smaller body, but may have to carry extra battery.
DSLR can shoot all day with a partially charged battery. Not mirrorless though. Need to charge battery before leaving the house. Keeping a battery fully charged is bad for its life and cause it to to loose capacity. OEM batteries are expensive at $50. Note that aftermarket ones are cheap, but poor quality. They are often rejects from manufactures for various reasons.
Sony zoom lens for full frame camera are expensive, not fast at f4, and of poor quality. Sony prime lens are good quality. Beware that Sony prime lens say Zeiss, but are not as good quality as "real" Zeiss. Obviously you get what you pay for. More lens should be coming though. 625g.
Competition is Canon 5D or Nikon D810. D810 body is 980g so is .75lbs heavier, but lens will be about the same. D810 you get base ISO 64 instead of 100 for one stop better picture quality. Of course, Nikon and Canon has many more native lens than Sony.

Canon EOS 5DS and 5DS R $3,700/$3,900 50.6MP Why: Ultra high resolution full frame camera. 5DS R deletes the anti-alias filter for sharper pictures. .71X viewfinder, 5fps, 1/8000 shutter, 1/200 flash sync. Fixed LCD. No 4k movies, no WiFi. Good high resolution camera. 930g

 

Medium Format Camera

These are the ultimate in picture quality. 68% larger sensor area than full frame. Very high resolution.

Pentax 645Z $8,496 51.4MP - Affordable "Medium Format" DSLR. Although not truly a medium format camera. Medium Format is 50.7x39. This is 44x33. Is a slight 1.16 multiplication factor for the lens. The only medium format camera to offer recording. ISO up to 204,8000. That is see in the dark value. The word "affordable" is relative here. Weight 1550g Use FA or DA 645 lens.

Alpa of Switzerland aprox. $6,500 depending on build. Excellent looking pictures.

Leica S2 $25,000 37.5MP Introduced in 2008 Why: You can't afford it, no need to ask.

 

 

High End Fixed Lens Camera w/ Larger Sensors (1" or Larger)

These are almost viable alternative to DSLR and Mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras. 1" sensor is starting to be large enough to be taken seriously.

1" Sensor Crop Factor = 2.7

M4/3 Sensor Crop Factor =2.0

1.5" Sensor Crop Factor = 1.9

Sigma Merrill Series: $708-$750 Came out in 2012 Why: Foveon X3 Sensor. 15MP APS-C size sensor. Like the SD1 Sigma DSLR, but with fixed focus lens. All three cameras are the same except with different fixed focal lengths.
For Foveon sensor, red, blue and green photocells are stacked on top of each other instead of individually spread over four squares in a Bayer mask pattern. Makes for super sharp picture that even D810 with 36MP cannot quite match. Lines and shapes are crisp and sharp. However, picture quality unacceptable after ISO 800. Also very slow autofocus that takes half to one second, slow writing to memory card, 640x480 movie only, and not very good battery life.
Some complain about the Sigma PhotoPro software being slow. I don't think so. Download the program, and use these files to test yourself.

DP1 Merrill: Equivalent 28mm f2.8 lens.

DP2 Merrill: Equivalent 50mm f2.8 lens.

DP3 Merrill: Equivalent 75mm f2.8 lens.

 

Sony DSC-RX1: $2,798 Came out in 2012 Why does it exist: Full frame sensor pocket camera! But no zoom. Fixed zoom 35mm f2.0 lens. 35mm is half way between 24mm wide and 50mm normal length. So focal length is on the wide side. That is all you get, and you can't zoom. There is also a RX1R that does not have the morie filter for sharper pictures, but at the risk of ailasing illusion when shooting closely spaced pattern like picket fence. Focus speed is moderately fast. This camera's full frame sensor is good for cranking up the ISO for high shutter speed and low indoor light, but with wide focal length lens, not so good for sports where you need a zoom to get into the action. Wide lens is also not so good for portrait. Tends to distort the view and makes people look big and wide. Although full frame gets you good bokeh to blur the background that is good for portrait. Wide angle lens is good for landscape, but usually, full frame is not needed for landscape where you do want everything to be sharp. You have to close the aperture to make all parts of the image sharp. People do wonder what is this camera good for. Full frame sounds great, but is not a strong seller.

Fujifilm X100S: $1,200 16MP Came out in 2013 Why does it exist: Alternative to the $6,900 Leica M9 range finder camera. This too is a range finder, but is APS-C sensor instead of full frame. Fixed 23mm f2 lens. Very high quality compact rangefinder camera. One of the best in rendering skin tone, so this too like the Leica is good for portraits. Excellent flash with the right tint. Many professional photographers love this simple fixed lens camera. X-trans sensor that eliminate need for anti-alias filter. Magnesium construction. Traditional controls with aperture adjust in the front on the lens just like traditional film cameras. Hybrid viewfinder with 2.35k-dot display. Viewfinder combines optical viewfinder for clarity with electronic display. Can overlay focus peaking or digital split prism on the optical viewfinder. Not horribly fast auto focus. Camera has been praised for its control layout. The Nikon DSLR retro Df has often been compared with this camera, but critics in general like the layout of this camera more. Autofocus is not very fast. Overall, is a high quality fixed lens camera, but being fixed lens, its usefullness is limited just like the Sony RX1.
Some people like the simplicity of a fixed lens so you don't end up carrying an entire bag of lens.
Ricoh GR 16.2MP Released 2013. Why does it exist: APS-C sized sensor fixed zoom compact camera. 18.5mm f2.8 lens. Equivalent of 28mm full frame lens. The equivalent 28mm lens is the issue here. Is one of those neither here nor there lens. 24mm is wide, and 50mm is normal because is what your eye sees. This is just right in between, which is kind of awkward IMHO. No anti-aliasing filter.
Nikon Coolpix A 16MP Released 2013 Why: Another fixed zoom lens camera from Nikon with the success of Fujifilm X100S. 28mm (equiv) f2.8 fixed zoom lens camera with APS-C sensor. Similar sensor to the excellent D7000 DSLR. No anti-aliasing filter.
Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-RX10 $998 Came out in 2013 20.2MP Why does it exist: All in one super zoom lens alternative to DSLR if you can accept a 1" sensor. Impressive specs. Super 24-200mm zoom that is no kidding f2.8 constant. Relatively large 1" sensor. Optical image stabilization. Add on top of that is a Zeiss lens. Weights 813g, so is heavy and large like a DSLR than a compact. Top and bottom are magnesium and is weather sealed. Focus is fast in bright light, but takes up to a second in poor light. That can dampen shooting experience. Great for outdoor sports. No good for indoor sports. Has a viewfinder. Tilting LCD screen, but cannot do 180 deg. Definitely competition to Nikon1 series of cameras. Nikon1 has slower f4.5-5.6 equiv. 27-270mm lens, but autofocus is faster, and can track an object while this cannot. Lack of tracking limits the use of the super zoom.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 $897 20MP Introduced in 2014 Why does it exist: All in one super zoom lens alternative to DSLR if you can accept a 1" sensor. Competition to Sony RX10. Powerful 24-200mm zoom that is relatively fast at f2.8-4. Also has impressive 5 axis stabilization. 831g weight, and size is more of a DSLR size camera. Is a serious contender for the Nikon 1 camera. Like the Nikon 1, autofocus is ultra fast on the camera. It use Depth of Defocus technology like on the much more expensive GH4 M4/3 mirrorless camera. However, this camera definitely cannot track focus. You have to do single shot focus, and assume the object has not moved much. If you need to track an object like bird or sports, Nikon 1 is the right camera. Compared to Nikon 1, here you already have the lens that is very capable. Has a viewfinder. In summary, Sony Zeiss lens is sharper and faster at f2.8. This has 5 axis stabilization and faster autofocus. Nikon 1 are much smaller than either one with very fast autofocus, but much slower 27-270mm f4.5-5.6 lens. Nikon1 also lets you change to other lens that includes the crazy equiv. 189-810mm f4.5-5.6.

Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II $799 12.8MP Introduced in 2014 Why does it exist. The biggest 1.5" sensor that is even 8% larger area than micro 4/3 camera! Powerful 24-120mm zoom and fast on the wide end f2-3.9 lens. This camera is short of the super zoom range, but has larger apeture than super zoom on the wide end at f2, and larger sensor than all the other super zoom. Sensor is 225% larger area than other superzooms that have 1" or even smaller sensors. Unfortunately, the sensor may have slightly better high ISO quality, but not very good in dynamic range compared with sony RX10 or RX100 that has smaller sensor. Acceptable autofocus speed (.21-.36 sec) except in low light. Sluggish focus in flash mode. Impressive all magnesium body, and optical stabilization. Wide end at 24mm is not a fisheye wide, but definitely very wide. Tele end is 120mm, which is good for portrait and zoom in on action. Tele end is less that true sports camera 200mm, but most likely adequate if you are not into sports or bird watching. Weight is only 553g, which is very light for a magnesium body camera. Pop-up flash. No build in viewfinder. Articulating 180deg LCD screen. Can use Canon Speedlite flash or Optional $240 EVF-DC1 viewfinder with 2.36M-dots on the hot shoe, but not both. Using a Speedlite with master option can trigger multiple flashes. Overall assesment is Sony RX10 is better. This has slightly better ISO noise, but poor in dynamic range. Low price, but when you add in viewfinder, is about the same as Sony, and Sony has f2.8 constant that is longer 24-200mm.

Fujifilm X100T: $1,300 16MP Came out in Nov 2014 Why doee it exist: Fixed prime lens APS-C size sensor compact camera. Upate to X100S. 23mm f2 lens (35mm equiv). Hybrid viewfinder similar to X100S where shooting information is superimposed on the viewfinder. This adds a shaded screen that can be moved into position so information can be clearly seen in all lights. In EVF mode, has super fast 54fps .005sec lag EVF from the XT1 camera with higher 1.04m dot LCD. Optional electronic shutter. Added dial in back of camera instead of rocker switch.

Sony DSC-RX100 III: $798 20.2MP Introduced in 2014 Why does it exist: About as good as it gets in small pocket camera. Nice 1" BSI sensor. Zeiss 24mm-70mm f2.8 lens. Do not consider this if you need a super zoom or moderately low light shooting. A camera that photographer afficionado would actually consider. The original RX100 came out in 2012. The 3rd version in 2014. 20MP BSI (Back Side Illuminated) 1" sensor. Wires behind photoreceptor for better light gathering. Expensive to manufacture, but better picture quality than normal 1" sensor. 70mm is considered low end of telephoto, so this is not a telezoom camera, but 70mm is enough to be somewhat useful, and better than nothing. Pocket sized point and shoot fixed lens. 24mm-70mm Zeiss lens is good quality and useful range. 1" sensor is larger than your typical point and shoot cameras. Articulating 180deg LCD screen. Same size as Nikon V1 mirrorless camera. Fast lens and relatively large sensor is good for low light, but still not as good as 4/3 sensor, and no where as good as APS-C or full frame. Still a good premium point and shoot that is one level below Micro4/3 cameras. Great for outdoor. Forget indoor fast action. Reasonable fast autofocus speed as long as the subject is stationary. Moving subject, forget about it. -120fps video at 1280x720. 1/2000sec flash sync, but no hotshoe. Internal flash only.
Competition is Canon G7X and Panasonic LX100.

Canon PowerShot G7 X $650 20MP Introduced in 2014 Why: True competitor to Sony RX100 MkIII Pocketable size, but brighter zoom lens and longer zoom. Magical camera that seems to do it all. 1" sensor and bright equiv. 24-100mm f1.8-2.8 lens. All in a very small package that is smaller than similar fast lens large sensor pocket cameras. Very impressive for its small pocket size. 304g WiFi. Build in flash, but no viewfinder. Use the same Sony back side illuminated (BSI) sensor as RX100, but dynamic range is about 1/2 stop higher than Sony RX100 III. Also the lens stay at lower f stop deeper into the zoom than Sony does. RX100III starts at f1.8 at 24mm, but very quickly goes to f2.8 at 30mm. This starts at f1.8, but goes to 50mm before it goes to f2.8. - 60fps at 1920x1080 video
Sony does have Zeiss lens that is sharper. Autofocus on Sony is also faster and more sure than canon. 1/2000sec flash sync. Articulate LCD.

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 $899 16MP (12MP Effective) Introduced in 2014 Why: Some incredible specs! 1) Large M4/3 sensor in a compact camera (But does not use the entire sensor). 2) f1.7-2.8 fast Leica DC Vario-Summilux lens. 3) Panasonic depth of defocus technology for super fast autofocus. Faster than Sony and Canon. 4) Rare leaf shutter to achieve 1/4000sec flash sync Most DSLR are only up to 1/250sec. Sony and Canon is less at 1/2000 sec. 5) 4k video.
Note the camera does not use the entire sensor. Realistically, is really 1.5X the area of its competition 1" sensor, and not 1.9X. Still a large sensor. Also a very fast lens, but not as pocketable as the Canon G7X or Sony RX100. Equiv. 24-75mm f1.7-2.8 lens. 393g Sensor on this camera is bigger than the Canon G7X and Sony RX100, and lens zoom is slightly less. 4k video. 9 blade aperture for better bokeh. Depth of defocus autofocus algorithm for lightning fast focusing. Has viewfinder, but big downside is no build in flash, but do come with a small external one, but is unwieldy to use. WiFi. 2.76M dot viewfinder. This is a strong competition to the the popular Sony RX100 III and Canon G7X as the best compact camera that is not a super zoom. In summary, this is bigger in size, and not really pocketable., But expect better picture quality, and 4k video. Canon has higher zoom and pretty much match this in picture quality for ISO, but this is slightly better in dynamic range, and smaller size. That leaves Sony that has Zeiss lens that is sharper than Canon and faster autofocus. Sony does have high speed video at 120fps. This one is 60fps at 1920x1080 video. This camera has the most control and customization of all three for professionals. No articulate LCD screen.

Leica D-Lux (Typ 109) Same camera as LX100, but with Leica "Red Dot" $1,195. Only difference might be longer warranty. Leica have 3 year warranty rather than 1 year for Panasonic. Also comes with Adobe Lightroom software worth $139. If you need to get the Lightroom anyway, then consider this as $157 for extended warranty. You get the painted red dot too.
Leica X (Typ 113) $2,295 16.2MP Why: Is a Leica camera. Summilux equivalent 35mm f1.7 lens. APS-C size sensor. Top quality construction from machined billet aluminum, magnesium and leather.

Sigma Quattro Series $899 29MP APS-C Sensor Why: Because Foveon X3 sensor, images are nothing short of breath taking sharp, brilliant smooth color transition. Improvement from DP2 Merrill. Pretty fast autofocus, but does not work well in dark. Write speed is slow at about 8 seconds a picture. ISO acceptable up to ISO 800, then picture quality degrades quickly. ISO range is 100-6400. Given the image degradation, no point going beyond 6400 anyway. No build in flash. External flash is definitely needed on this camera given the ISO.
Camera is not as polished as other major manufacture. More of a start-up product. People don't like it because high ISO image quality is poor. Past models autofocus is slow, but greatly improved here. Still, bottom line, because of Foveon sensor, you will never find better image than this camera short of a medium format camera if even then. Images are better than full frame camera, no kidding. This camera is a secret that many photographers don't know much about. Do seriously consider this.

DP1 Quattro: Equivalent 28mm f2.8 lens.
DP2 Quattro: Equivalent 45mm f2.8 lens.
DP3 Quattro: Equivalent 50mm f2.8 lens. Release date to be announced.


 

Canon PowerShot G3 X $999 20.2MP Why: 24-600mm super 25X zoom camera size of the thin compact G7X. Why not: F2.8-5.6 lens is slow on the zoom end. Trade zoom for slower lens. 5 axis image stabilization - a must for his high zoom and slow lens.WiFi. 733g.

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-RX10 II $998 Why: Updated RX10. Fast super zoom 24-200mm f2.8. Killer hardware. Fast focus, fast shutter, fast lens, 4k video and very high speed 960fps video. Optical image stabilization. Why not: Large size, and as with mirrorless , do not expect it to focus track. Stacked CMOS instead of BSI. More light gathering ability and faster readout for framerate. 4k video, also high speed video of 960fps at 1136x384 resolution! 24-200mm f2.8. 2.35 million-dot electronic viewfinder instead of 1.44 M-dots. 1/32,000 sec shutter! 813g

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-RX100 IV $949 16.8MP Why: Small camera with very fast normal zoom 24-70mm f1.8-2.8. Zeiss lens. That is equivalent to f3.2-5 on an APS-C camera! Amazing light gathering in a package this size. Add to that killer hardware. Fast focus, fast shutter, fast lens, 4k video and very high speed 960fps video. Optical image stabilization. Why not: Can't think of much. Only 1" sensor. (But what do you expect for pocket camera) Normal zoom instead of super zoom like RX10. Stacked CMOS instead of BSI. More light gathering ability and faster readout for framerate. Focus is as fast as .09 sec. Zeiss lens. Added 2.35 million-dot electronic viewfinder instead of 1.44 M-dots. Tilting LCD. High speed video of 960fps! 1/32,000 sec shutter! 298g

Leica Q (Type 116) $4,250 24MP Why: Good deal as far as Leica is concerned. Full Frame 28mm f1.7 Summilux. If bought separate with Leica M rangefinder and lens, would cost you $13,000. Why not: Sony RX1 is much cheaper at $2,800. This is a mirrorless, first for Leica, and not an optical viewfinder camera. Has un-Leica like technology like biggest 3.68m dots viewfinder, 1/16,000 electronic shutter and 1/2000 sec sync speed. 10fps burst rate. WiFi 640g

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100/TZ100 $700 20.1MP Why: Small size but has good zoom 25-250mm f2.8-5.9. 312g.

 

 

High End Fixed Lens Compact Camera w/ Small Sensors (Smaller than 1")

These are the traditional compact cameras with small sensors. However, these top of the line models have fast lens or super zooms to make them appealing to the enthusiasts. Their advantage is compact pocket size.

Two size of sensors are included here:

1/2.3" Sensor Crop Factor = 5.6

1/1.7" Sensor Crop Factor = 4.6.

See graph below. Note that at sensor size smaller than 1", the image quality is not that much different than an iPhone. Keep that in mind. You may be better off just carrying an iPhone. Of course, these cameras may have a higher range zoom lens. There are some advantage, but not enough to justify carrying another device.

Canon PowerShot S110 12.1 MP $249 Why: Very compact, but not very bright lens. Equivalent 24-120mm f2-5.9 1/1.7" sensor. 173g. Canon started with the obsolete S90 in 2009. It was ground breaking because this is a point and shoot with f2.0 lens at least on the wide end. Took very nice pictures for its days. Many cameras have since followed suit. Still a good small compact camera. Its price has been pushed down because of competition from smart phones. Is also one of the few cameras with slow motion capability at 120fps.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 16MP $399 Why: Basically an camera with Android operating system. Samsung's carpet bombing approach to marketing. Throw things out and see what sticks. Equivalent 23-483mm f2.8-5.9 1/2.3" sensor. 283g. Huge zoom range. 23mm is very wide.483mm is very high zoom. Large Android screen makes show and tell sharing easy. Makes great sense for casual photographers who wants a step up from smart phones.
Casio EX-100 12MP $692 Why: Mainly for very high speed video. Fast lens, large zoom range. Specialty camera with interesting features. 1000 fps video at 224x64 resolution only. High speed and circular buffer. Buffer never fills up, just deletes earlier image. Small 1/1.7" sensor, but is back illuminated, 28-300mm f2.8 lens. up to 30FPS speed. Incredibly fast 1/20,000 shutter. Slow autofocus. Not available in US and too expensive. Very similar to Olympus Stylus 1. High speed video: 512x384@240fps, 224x160@480, 224x64@1000fps.
Olympus Stylus 1 12MP $699 Why: Fast lens with huge zoom range in a relatively small camera. 28-300mm f2.8 1/1.7" BSI sensor. 402g. No as fast video like on Casio. Still does 120fps as 640x480 and 240fps at 320x240. Not too bad. Fast lens and good zoom. Only issues is 28mm no where near wide enough. Nees to be 24mm wide. That little bit makes a difference.
Fujifilm X20: $499 12MP Came out in 2013 Why does it exist: Range finder camera with zoom lens. Optical viewfinder zooms with the lens. Good: 28-122mm f2-f2.8 fast lens. Bad: Only 2/3" sized sensor. Is half the diagonal size of the 1" sensor. This is a point and shoot camera sized sensor. Magnesium top and bottom plate. Pop-up flash. Hybrid auto focus with focus detector on sensor, but focus is still not very fast. Somewhat obsolete with larger sensor compact cameras on the market with equally fast lens. Somewhat unique in that it has a optical viewfinder.
Olympus XZ-2 10MP 1/1.7" sensor. $599 Why: Second brightest lens, just behind Panasonic LX7 below. Equivalent 28-112mm f1.8-2.5. 346g
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 $397 1/1.7" sensor, Why: Claim to fame as the fastest lens f1.4-2.3 on compact camera category. Just beat out Olympus Stylus X2-2 by .2, from f2.5 to f2.3 here. 24-90mm f1.4-2.3 10.1MP Responsive autofocus. Very competitive camera. Best in terms of fast lens that is wide enough, good autofocus. But not a high zoom camera but adequate. 298g Compare this with the Panasonic LX100. LX100 is twice as expensive, but has much larger M4/3 sensor, and equally fast lens. Panasonic makes some very competitive products to make up for it's non-camera brand.
Canon G16 12MP $499 1/1.7" Sensor. Equiv 28-140mm f1.8-2.8. The standard in enthusiast compact camera for many years. It always had a small sensor, but that was not a problem for many years. However, other cameras have gone to larger sensor size already, leaving this behind. Is now more of a downgraded camera. 28mm not wide enough, but 140mm is pretty long. f1.8 to 2.8 is good, but Panasonic LX7 has faster lens. Trading longer zoom, but not wide enough on the wide side with faster lens. WiFi, 12.2/9.2 FPS. 320x240 at 240fps 640x480 120fps. 356g 109x76x40mm
Fujifilm X30: $599 12MP 2/3" sensor. equiv 28-112mm f2-2.8 Intro on 9/2014. Why does it exist. "Improvement" on X20. Difference: No more optical viewfinder. Electronic viewfinder. Focus peaking. Phase detect autofocus cells on sensor. Faster autofocus. Better battery life. Same size sensor, same MP, same f2-2.8 aperture. 28-112mm instead of 28-122mm. Control wheel around the lens. 2.3M-dot EVF has delay of only .005sec. Has a great EVF. Still compare with the strong competition, this has smaller sensor. 423g 119x72x60mm
Fujifilm XQ1 12MP 2/3" sensor. $399 Why: Very compact pocket camera with fast lens at the wide end. Not much else. 25-100mm f1.8-4.9. Optically stabilized. Has EXR mode like X10. Very small camera, but trade off is slower lens at the high zoom level. 206g 100x59x33mm
Nikon Coolpix P7800 12MP 1/1.7" sensor. $546 Why: Super zoom compact camera. Moderately fast 28-200mm f2-4 lens. Vibration reduction. Has high zoom with vibration reduction, but now wide enough at the wide end. 24mm is preferable. Flip LCD screen. 399g. 119x78x50mm Controls are slow, and write times are slow.
Nikon Coolpix P340 12.2MP 1/1.7" sensor. Equiv 24-120mm f1.8-5.6 lens. WiFi Slow write times. 194g 103x58x32
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LF1 12.2MP 1/1.7" sensor Equiv 28-200mm f2-5.9 Has viewfinder, but is slow response. 192g 103x62x28mm
Nikon P900 16MP 1/2.3" sensor. $600 Equiv 24-2000mm f2.8-6.5. Why: This is not just super zoom, but ultra 83x zoom. Highest zoom of any camera. Very sharp lens. See moons of Jupiter! Why not: This is no small camera. DSLR sized, but with small sensor. Excellent 5 stops image stabilization. Articulating LCD, electronic viewfinder, WiFi, GPS.899g

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

216x144 72dpi 3"x2"